Topless Kate
The British media has been obsessed with photos of the Duchess of Cambridge's bare boobs since Friday, but daren't show them with Lord Justice Leveson pondering his verdict on the gutter press. So I thought I'd take a look to see what all the fuss is about. Easy enough to find through Google UK (CLICK if you must). The photos are pathetic. They were taken with a massive zoom lens from half a mile away! The editor of Closer claimed the couple were "visible from the street". Only if you happened to have a huge telephoto lens for long-distance wildlife photography or paparazzi snooping in your camera bag plus a hefty stand. Here's Kate looking demure for her first visit to a mosque on the day the story broke. Nice photo.
posted by Unknown @ 16.9.12
2 comments
2 Comments:
The Royal couple have the same right to privacy as the man in the street, but they were naïve in thinking that they wouldn't be followed. The idea that it is visible from the street is laughable and the lens would have been large. She is a beautiful woman and has a right to relax her way, but she will be followed all the time and they need to be more careful. Personally, I can't be bothered with looking at the photos. They should be left in the bin. The photo you posted made her look beautiful.
Kate is unrecognisable in the photos I've seen, but the prince in baggy blue shorts is recognisable. I guess the Palace had to admit the photos are of Kate to forestall the question Who is that topless woman with the prince?
The couple are rich modern jet-setters who seek warmer climes, where the paparazzi lie in wait. They need to be a lot more circumspect. They are fair game, just like movie stars and models.
Post a Comment
<< Home